Friday, January 25, 2008

Turkey with pork in it?

and other food no no's

Jenny-O turkey Italian sausages are wrapped in a pork casing.

I don't know why it dawned on me on me that day, but while I was taking the sausage out of the casing, which I always do, I realized, turkey's don't have guts that big... what is this stuff? And low and behold in the ingredients, pork casing. So for for those of us that don't eat pork, here's a warning. (although the best one I ever heard was just don't eat ANY ground meats and you're good)


I don't really have the strictest dietary demands, but I do cook for a lot of people so it dawned on me to start seriously looking at the labels of different seasonings I used to make sure there were not any mistakes like this pirkey problem. And I came up with these two on my shelf. I'll find more later I'm sure.

Worcestershire sauce is NOT vegan, it contains fish sauce and anchovies


Guinness is also not vegan, something about trace particles of fish due to processing.


post any of your own food oddities in the comments and we'll keep tabs.

PS. If you read the ingredients to a box of Chicken in a Biscuit, can someone PLEASE answer me, what is chicken extract? or do I really want to know?

The whole Margarine is black before it's yellow thing

So I'm so not into processed food, even if there are times when the cravings get the best of me. But a couple years ago I got an email that must have circled the globe at least 4 times about how margarine is black before it is dyed yellow because it is a derivative of plastic. Now I've actually looked high and low for REAL evidence of this, including scientific journals about margarine, it's origin, even manufacturing documents. Can't find one that supports that statement, or even a credible argument against it (this includes the diabolical cool whip is also black scheme). Everything discovered states that most margarines are made from plant oils that are altered to become solids at room temperature, it's like ironing out a kink in the long chain like molecule.

So rest easy dear butter substitute friends, I'm pretty sure you're not eating plastic, (at least not in your margarine), but whether or not it's actually better for you than butter is still highly debatable.

Thursday, January 17, 2008

Now I know why Too Short always took Southwest

The Southwest Airlines Stripper Plane

Every Friday evening, some time before most people have clocked out of work and begin heading home for the weekend, a plane takes off from LAX.

Like so many other flights at this time, this one is also heading to Las Vegas. It's not full of gamblers, however, but rather a disproportionate amount of silicon that bounces and jiggles through the warm, desert-air turbulence all the way to Vegas where, for the remainder of Friday and Saturday night, it will continue quivering away at $20 a pop.

This, folks, is the Southwest Stripper Plane.

The passengers are LA's greatest temporary export, heading off for a weekend of singles and 20s to help baby pay the rent. They are blessed with the sun-kissed glory of Southern California and enhanced by the world's greatest plastic surgeons, and of course every single one is a struggling teacher, college student, or some other admirable profession that will keep suckers reaching into their wallet time after time to help out their worthy cause, whatever it might be.

No one really knows what time this legendary, perhaps even mythical flight leaves Los Angeles. Seats are reserved months in advance and few mere mortals are able to secure a reservation. A friend of mine claims he once found himself on this flight but can't seem to remember the details, as though some powerful force scrubbed his brain clean, leaving only a trace of glitter on his sweaty forehead.

Others less fortunate can only dream that the planets align one day and that they find themselves sitting on a plane in Los Angeles watching their fellow passengers squeeze their gigantic moneymakers into Southwest's cramped economy seats. If there was ever a time for long delays or a casualty-free crash on a desert island, this would certainly be it.

Remember Kyla Ebbert, the girl Southwest imposed a dress code o

Saturday, January 12, 2008

I don't even know what i'm voting for

SO i'm filling out my absentee ballot (because I believe in paper ballots) and I come across Prop's 94-97. There's nothing in my voter guide that gets mail ed to me so I look it up on line. The Ca. Secretary of State office also has no information available (404 message). WTF. Seriously. Isn't it illegal to put something on the ballot that you can't get information for? you don't even know what you're voting for. I mean from the outline on the ballot I understand that the state wants to take money from casino tribes, but it doesn't say where the money is going. And it's gonna be damn hard to find out. I suppose I'll have to not vote on it. Unlike our current administration I won't cast a vote on something that I am not fully informed about.
cheers.
Go Obama.

Dear California, PLEASE succeed from the union

California could become third state to ban forced microchip tag implants (RFID)




Photo courtesy of VeriChip Corp.
The VeriChip implantable RFID tag, made up of a microchip and an antenna encased in glass, is 12 mm long and 2 mm in diameter, about the size of a grain of rice.

It would be an interesting feature of an employee’s first day: sign a contract, fill out a W-2 and roll up your sleeve for your microchip injection.

Sounds like sci-fi, but it’s happened, and now a handful of states are making sure their citizens will never be forced to have a microchip implanted under their skin.

If Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger (R) signs a bill passed Sept. 4, California would join Wisconsin and North Dakota in banning human implanting of these tags without consent.

No one’s quite sure how real a threat these forced implants might be, or why states are feeling compelled to protect their residents from being physically tagged. Lawmakers are calling the legislation pre-emptive, while the industry that produces the technology sees the states’ action as fear mongering.

Radio-frequency identification (RFID) tags – tiny, data-storing microchips about the size of a grain of rice – are in passports, in Wal-Mart factory shipments and in subway passes in cities from New York to Taiwan. They are also in humans. On one less-than-likely episode of "Law & Order: Special Victims Unit," a paranoid actor Bob Saget even uses one to monitor his adulterous wife.

Unlike Global Positioning System (GPS) technology, which is used for constant, real-time tracking, RFID tags are scanned at close range – usually from a few feet to a few inches. The tags are tracked by scanners installed at checkpoints, such as office doors or warehouse loading docks. The systems are also commonly used in highway toll collection and as theft protection in car keys.

In humans, they have been used to store medical information, to track movement and to gain access to locked rooms. To date, 2,000 RFID chips have been sold for implantation in humans, says VeriChip Corp., the only manufacturer with a Food and Drug Administration-approved implantable chip.

The company is focusing its technology on medical patient identification, and about 400 patients, including those with Alzheimer's disease, have RFIDs implanted. Other VeriChip human implants have been used by a Spanish nightclub to allow VIPs with implanted chips to bypass entrance lines and by the Mexico attorney general’s staff to safeguard identity information at a time when the kidnapping of government officials there is not uncommon.

Some customers are using them as high-tech keys. Ohio security firm CityWatcher.com raised eyebrows in 2006 when it requested that some of its employees be “chipped,” or implanted with tags for access to certain rooms. According to published reports, only two employees got the implants before the company dropped the program. CityWatcher.com has since shut down.

But forced chipping has been a rare practice, leading some industry spokespeople to decry regulation as “scare tactics.”

Wisconsin enacted the first RFID ban in May 2006, and North Dakota in April. Colorado and Ohio have bills in committee, and Oklahoma and Florida saw theirs die last session. Except for one U.S. House proposal to use RFID tags to track prescription drugs, Congress has not widely addressed the technology.

Legislators admit that the few laws being enacted are pre-emptive. Wisconsin state Rep. Marlin Schneider (D) had never heard of CityWatcher.com when he drafted the first implant ban.

“I had heard about this device from CNN or someplace, and I went into the office and said, ‘Get a bill drafted that prohibits this,’” he said. “This is beyond even what Orwell imagined.”

State Sen. Joe Simitian (D), who authored California’s bill, said he first looked into RFID legislation after grade schools in Sutter County, Calif., required students to wear IDs containing the chips to help monitor attendance. The move prompted privacy complaints from parents, and the school eventually stopped using the technology.

Simitian introduced four other RFID bills, dealing with criminal punishment for identity theft, security standards and use of these tags in driver’s licenses and school IDs.

All four proposals were originally pieces of California’s Identity Information Protection Act of 2006, which passed but was vetoed by Schwarzenegger. In a statement, he recommended waiting for standards from the federal Real ID Act, a plan to organize states’ driver’s licenses into a national system. The governor has until Oct. 14 to sign or veto the newly passed bill.

The lack of security in the chips is particularly alarming, Simitian said, and is a major reason he thinks the state should step in with regulation. A May 2006 story in Wired Magazine featured Jonathan Westhues, a 24-year-old engineer who demonstrated how he could (and did) covertly scan a company’s RFID employee badge and break into the office – all with a cheap, homemade reader. He’s since posted detailed instructions on how to make the reader on his Web site.

Westhues likens RFID chips to “a repurposed dog tag. … The Verichip is built with no attempt at security, and is therefore not very special to clone,” he writes on his Web site.

How low-tech are these homemade readers?

Determined to show the security flaws to skeptics in the Legislature, Simitian asked a tech-savvy grad student from his office to build one. The student then wandered the state Capitol one afternoon with the reader in his briefcase. In the process, he stole the security numbers of nine representatives. The reader could send out any of those numbers, getting him past any locked door a state senator would have access to. And he would appear as the senator in the electronic records.

Manufacturers and industry representatives say that no cases of such identity theft have been documented. But depending on the desired level of security, cameras and guards should be used in addition to RFID tags, says the AeA (formerly the American Electronics Association).

The technology is being embraced by a few government agencies. Both Vermont and Washington state have agreed to work with the Department of Homeland Security to test RFID driver’s licenses, although they won’t be required by citizens. The U.S. Department of Defense has been tracking shipments with RFID tags since 2003.

Besides possible privacy breaches, the new technology also has raised health alarms. Studies of implants used in the past 12 years have linked RFIDs to cancer in lab mice and rats, according to The Associated Press.

The studies did not have control groups for the cancer, and manufacturers report no complications with the millions of pets that have had various chip implants over the last 15 years. But the results were enough for some scientists to question the FDA’s approval of the technology.

Guantanamo detainees deemed inhuman by judges

WTF. So no who ever works with them can do whatever they want, like torture, experiment on, kill..

Guantanamo detainees are not human beings - US judges

Fri, 01/11/2008 - 19:51 - Wire Services

On the sixth anniversary of the imprisonment of detainees at the Guantánamo Bay Naval Base, a United States judge threw out lawsuit brought by four former British detainees against Donald Rumsfeld and senior military officers for ordering torture and religious abuse, ruling that th the detainees are not "Persons" under U.S. Law, which according to another judge, means that they are less than "human beings".

The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit also ruled that torture is a "foreseeable consequence" of military detention in dismissing the action brought by Shafiq Rasul, Asif Iqbal, Rhuhel Ahmed and Jamal Al-Harith, who spent more than two years in Guantánamo and were repatriated to the U.K. in 2004.

In a 43-page opinion, Circuit Judge Karen Lecraft Henderson found that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, a statute that applies by its terms to all “persons” did not apply to detainees at Guantánamo, effectively ruling that the detainees are not persons at all for purposes of U.S. law.

The Court also dismissed the detainees’ claims under the Alien Tort Statute and the Geneva Conventions, finding defendants immune on the basis that “torture is a foreseeable consequence of the military’s detention of suspected enemy combatants,” and ruled that even if torture and religious abuse were illegal, defendants were immune under the Constitution because they could not have reasonably known that detainees at Guantánamo had any constitutional rights.

Judge Janice Rogers Brown agreed with the result but attacked the majority for using a definition of person “at odds with its plain meaning.”

“There is little mystery that a ‘person’ is an individual human being…as distinguished from an animal or thing.” she added and concluded that majority’s decision “leaves us with the unfortunate and quite dubious distinction of being the only court to declare those held at Guantánamo are not ‘person[s].’ This is a most regrettable holding in a case where plaintiffs have alleged high-level U.S. government officials treated them as less than human.”

“We are disappointed that the D.C. Circuit has not held Secretary Rumsfeld and the chain of command accountable for torture at Guantánamo," Michael Ratner of the Center for Constitutional Rights, co-counsel on the case, commented. "The entire world recognizes that torture and religious humiliation are never permissible tools for a government. We hope that the Supreme Court will make clear that this country does not tolerate torture or abuse by an unfettered executive.”

Monday, January 7, 2008

After a long deliberation

Albums of 2007:
  1. Mos Def: True Magic (hey it came out Dec. 29 2006, it's counts as 07 airplay)
  2. The Noisettes: What's The Time Mr. Wolf?
  3. Amy Winehouse: Back to Black (2006 release)
  4. The White Stripes: Icky Thump
  5. Stephen Marley: Mind Control
  6. Pharoah Monch: Desire
  7. Dan The Automator Presents 2K7 (2006 release)
  8. Betty Davis: re-release
  9. Mark Ronson: Version (strait sleeper)
  10. Ben Harper: Lifeline
  11. Ali Farka Toure: Savane (2006 release)
  12. RJD2: The Third Hand
  13. Prince: Planet Earth
  14. Arctic Monkeys: Whatever People Say I am, That's What I'm Not
  15. Lily Allen: Alright Still (2006 release)
  16. Babel Gilberto: Momento
  17. J-Dilla: Ruff Draft
  18. Saul Williams: The Inevitable Rise and Liberation of Niggy Tardust!
  19. Feist: The Reminder
  20. Death Proof Soundtrack